<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Amazon Cloudfront: Solution to Launch Server Meltdowns?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hightechmarketing.com/blog/2008/11/19/new-amazon-cloudfront-solution-to-launch-server-meltdowns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hightechmarketing.com/blog/2008/11/19/new-amazon-cloudfront-solution-to-launch-server-meltdowns/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing Ideas, Tactics and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:05:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Linden</title>
		<link>http://hightechmarketing.com/blog/2008/11/19/new-amazon-cloudfront-solution-to-launch-server-meltdowns/comment-page-1/#comment-9081</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Linden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hightechmarketing.com/blog/?p=98#comment-9081</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been having great results with CloudFront for hosting my videos used in advertisements. I think that&#039;s the killer right there, big launches are increasingly using large videos that eat up the bandwidth and http processes. By offloading it you only have to worry about serving up the dynamic content. And it&#039;s also much cheaper than getting additional servers as you only pay for what you use!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been having great results with CloudFront for hosting my videos used in advertisements. I think that&#8217;s the killer right there, big launches are increasingly using large videos that eat up the bandwidth and http processes. By offloading it you only have to worry about serving up the dynamic content. And it&#8217;s also much cheaper than getting additional servers as you only pay for what you use!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

